Fiber Deep and Node+0 Architectures: WDM Transceiver Parameters and Transmission Impairments

Nov. 14, 2019
Here, we’ll discuss some of the parameters network planners should consider when evaluating optical transceiver options, including the potential transmission impairment issues.

The use of multiwavelength transmission – typically variations of wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) such as coarse or dense WDM (CWDM or DWDM) – can enable cable operators to leverage already installed outside plant fiber cable when moving to fiber deep and Node+0 architectures. This is the third article in a four-part series that details various aspects of WDM that operators should consider when making architecture and technology choices. The previous articles in the series provided background information on WDM and fiber deep and on WDM component technology; the final article looks at network architecture and cabling strategies. Here, we’ll discuss some of the parameters network planners should consider when evaluating optical transceiver options, including the potential transmission impairment issues that could influence transceiver selection as well as which network elements may be required.

Transmission of Multiwavelength Systems

For optimized optical performance over CWDM or DWDM, optical power and laser spectral width are key parameters when selecting a transceiver.

Optical power, of course, helps determine whether the WDM transmission will reach its destination. However, operators should consider more than pure power in this context. Maintaining and controlling the power per wavelength can help overcome or avoid many of the optical impairments we’ll discuss in the next section. Consideration of lasers with consistent and similar output power and narrow spectral width will help reduce the risk of impairments.

And what is spectral width? It’s the range of wavelengths a typical laser will emit. In DWDM systems, the wider the spectrum of the light source, the more dispersion the signal will suffer when traveling through the fiber. Also, it is advantageous in multiwavelength transmission to pack the channels as closely together as possible to maximize the number of wavelengths per fiber. The narrower the spectral width, the more channels (wavelengths) you can have on a single fiber.

CWDM lasers typically have a large spectral width (4-7 nm) at 20-nm spacing. Power per wavelength is selectable, and 25-30 dB of optical budget is common. DWDM lasers have a small spectral width (0.3 nm) at 100-GHz spacing (0.8 nm). Power per wavelength is selectable and 25-30 dB of optical budget is common.

Figure 1 shows a typical DWDM laser specification.

Understanding potential transmission impairments

MSOs evolving their networks with more DWDM must manage optical performance by controlling linear impairments, like attenuation and dispersion, as well as nonlinear impairments.

Attenuation is the loss of signal strength as it propagates down the fiber and is measured in decibels of power lost (dB). Attenuation can affect the ability of the light to reach the receiver with sufficient power. Dispersion is the spreading of signal pulses as they propagate down the fiber. Dispersion can affect the ability of the receiver to distinguish discrete signal pulses. See Figure 2 for illustrations of both concepts.

Linear impairments like attenuation and dispersion can be controlled, managed, and compensated using optical amplifiers and dispersion compensation modules. Harder to manage are nonlinear impairments that affect the “energy” of the light pulse:
  • Four-Wave Mixing (FWM): FWM products can coincide with a signal channel, causing interference that distorts the signal amplitude.
  • Stimulated Brillion Scattering (SBS): SBS involves the interaction of incident light with acoustic waves and can cause signal loss and shift in wavelength.
  • Stimulated Raman Scattering (SRS): SRS causes shorter wavelengths to experience power loss, creating a “tilt” effect by skewing the power distribution among the wavelengths.

Figure 3 illustrates these nonlinear impairments.

It is also important to control pulse-shaping impairments that affect the “shape” of the light pulse:

  • Self-Phase Modulation (SPM): In SPM, the phase of a single propagating wave is modulated by the optical intensity fluctuations in the same wave, causing a single channel’s pulses to self-distort as they propagate down an optical fiber.
  • Cross-Phase Modulation (XPM): XPM occurs when the optical intensity of an optical wave propagating in a fiber modulates the phase of the other co-propagating optical signals. The result: multiple channels can interact as they propagate down an optical fiber, causing interference.

Figure 4 illustrates these two potential impairments.

Mitigating optical impairments

For consistent, reliable performance, MSOs must manage their networks’ linear and nonlinear impairments. Though some impairments are a function of the properties of the glass and cannot be changed, others -- such as number of wavelengths/channel spacing, power per wavelength, and transmission distance -- can be controlled to improve optical performance. We’ve already discussed how controlling power per wavelength can improve transmission performance in the face of impairments. Here are two other parameters to consider:

  1. Number of Wavelengths/Channel Spacing: Moving to DWDM and deploying greater than 40 channels requires considering the quality of the filter specifications and executing a channel plan that can successfully support the network.
  2. Distance: Transmission distance can be controlled at the design phase. Longer distances with amplification increase the probability of impairments.

Figure 5 illustrates the three strategies we’ve discussed.

The most fundamental part of a fiber deep deployment, of course, is the fiber. The final article in our fiber deep series reviews network architecture and cabling strategies. If you’d like more background on WDM and fiber deep or information on WDM component technology and specification parameters, you’ll find them in the previous parts of this series.

David Kozischek is an applications marketing manager at Corning Optical Communications.

About the Author

Dave Kozischek | Market Manager Enterprise Networks

David Kozischek has more than 28 years of experience in communications technology and a profound commitment to Corning Optical Communications' products and services. In this role, Mr. Kozischek is responsible for creating and leading efforts to drive optical solutions in targeted MSO/CATV FTTx application areas. FTTx may include FTTH, FTTB, FTTC, FTTT, or other fiber deep architectures deployed by the MSO/CATV market. Mr. Kozischek is also responsible for providing deep FTTx application/market expertise and thought leadership externally, and providing marketing leadership for new product commercializations

Mr Kozischek has a BS in Electrical Engineering from North Carolina State University and a BS in Business/Marketing from University of North Carolina at Wilmington.

Sponsored Recommendations

Data Center Interconnection

June 18, 2024
Join us for an interactive discussion on the growing data center interconnection market. Learn about the role of coherent pluggable optics, new connectivity technologies, and ...

The Journey to 1.6 Terabit Ethernet

May 24, 2024
Embark on a journey into the future of connectivity as the leaders of the IEEE P802.3dj Task Force unveil the groundbreaking strides towards 1.6 Terabit Ethernet, revolutionizing...

Applying Network Automation

Sept. 27, 2022
Service providers and data center network operators continue to investigate how software-based capabilities can improve the efficiency of their infrastructures. This On Topic ...

The Pluggable Transceiver Revolution

May 30, 2024
Discover the revolution of pluggable transceivers in our upcoming webinar, where we delve into the advancements propelling 400G and 800G coherent optics. Learn how these innovations...