Thousand-by-thousand, where art thou?

By DR. DENNY K. MIU, Integrated Micromachines--What happened to those big all-photonic switches? They got hit by a train.

Th 116074
Th 116074
Figure 1. The advent of ultra-long-reach technology has created two classes of traffic: pass through and local add/drop.

What happened to those big all-photonic switches? They got hit by a train.

Dr. Denny K. Miu
Integrated Micromachines

The last two years of the telecommunications industry -- between OFC 2000 in Baltimore and OFC 2002 in Anaheim -- was unquestionably a gravity-defying roller-coaster ride for all of us. Many predictions made two years ago turned out to be completely overstated. In particular, the explosive billion-dollar market opportunity promised for the revolutionary three-dimensional MEMS photonic crossconnects (PXCs), with their supposedly "thousand-by-thousand" port count, clearly did not materialize.

An interesting question remains: If and when the industry recovers, would the carriers still see a need to deploy such large-port-count PXCs? The simple answer is probably no. Due to a number of unforeseen economic and technological factors, the port-count requirements for PXCs might forever have been reduced from the thousands to the hundreds. To better understand that, it's necessary to revisit the past -- to the onset of another revolution.

A switching fable

Once upon a time, before the invention of steam engines, when the West was still wild and the buffalos had a valley to roam, horse-drawn carriages were the only means of mass transportation. Back then, journeys were short and towns were typically never more than a few hours apart. When a stagecoach arrived at a station, every passenger would have to disembark, regardless of whether that stop was their final destination. After a "3-R regeneration" (in this case, relax, refuel, and relief), everyone would board again to continue to the next town. In essence, this primitive transportation network was nothing more than a collection of "point-to-point" routes interconnecting individual towns (i.e., "nodes"). Due to obvious limitations, traffic was "terminated" at every node regardless of their origin and destination.

Then came the railroad and the trains. For the first time, the "reach" of the transportation vehicles exceeded the "distance" that most travelers wanted to travel. Towns no longer needed to be full-fledged "terminals" and most became simply "add/drop" stations. Traveling was improved from point-to-point to "end-to-end," allowing scheduling and "provisioning," which required distinguishing between "long-haul" and "local" traffic. Special equipment was added (sleeping quarters, dining rooms, and toilets) to accommodate passengers who would prefer to simply "pass through" the intermediate nodes. Traffic was terminated only when they reached their destination and nowhere else.

Similarly, two years ago, DWDM transport technology had limited reach (the distance an optical signal can travel without electrical regeneration). As a result, the optical network was architected as a constellation of point-to-point links. These links were jointed by back-to-back DWDM line terminals where the optical signals were optically demultiplexed into individual wavelengths and electrically converted into parallel streams of broadband signals for 3R regeneration (reamplification, reshaping and, retiming).

The electrical signals were fed through a number of interconnecting boxes, electrical add/drop multiplexers (ADMs), and digital crossconnects (DXCs), which now are gradually being replaced by ultra-broadband electronic crossconnects (EXCs). The traffic was aggregated and groomed to individual output channels, which were then optically remultiplexed and launched into the next DWDM link.

This process is obviously very expensive and was thought not to be scalable enough to accommodate the explosive growth of Internet traffic. Two years ago, the perceived solution was to replace the DXCs and EXCs with inexpensive and more scalable PXCs. Since each fiber could contain hundreds of wavelengths, it did not take much to convince everyone that what was needed were PXCs with thousands of ports.

As long as all incoming traffic was to be terminated and long-distance data was treated no differently than local data, this solution seemed reasonable -- equivalent to attempting to accommodate the increasing flow of westward traffic through frontier towns by modernizing and improving the efficiency of saloons, bath houses, and hotels. Then came the railroad and the trains....

Changing circumstances

Two years is a very long time for a dynamic and emerging industry such as optical networking. During the last two years, both the available technology and the underlying economics of optical networks have evolved substantially -- having the combined effect of reducing the port-count requirement for PXCs from thousands to hundreds.

In addition to changes in port count, the opportunity for volume deployment of PXCs has migrated from the core to the metro (more on that later). But even at the core, the application of PXCs has changed significantly from two years ago. For carriers that have the resources and sustainable business model to build a long-haul (LH) network from scratch, they can now select from suppliers that have architected the next-generation "transparent" network, which combines PXCs with Raman-based ultra-long-reach (ULR) transport technology and tunable lasers.

With the advent of ULR transport technology, the distance the optical signal can travel can now be extended to as much as 6,000 km (far exceeding the distance between nodes), so traffic can be easily routed through multiple nodes without electrical termination and regeneration. In this architecture, just like the railroad and trains, the nodes are no longer terminals but simple add/drop stations (Figure 1). Furthermore, the network is now segmented into two layers: the top layer being the optical express layer, which is managed by the optical ADM (OADM, a limited form of PXC), and the bottom layer being the service layer, managed by the EXC. As a result, traffic coming into a node is classified into two categories: The first type is express traffic, which is passed through or rerouted to the next node (such that it stays in the express layer), and the second type is for local add/drop, which requires electrical termination and is directed onto the EXC for grooming (where the granularity is STS-1) and local consumption.

This architecture also recognizes that Internet traffic is inherently long-distance, such that on average the sole purpose of about 50% of the traffic that comes to a node is to pass through to another node. As a result, there is a significant cost saving in the construction and operation of an optical network, if unnecessary back-to-back electrical termination/regeneration for transit/express traffic is eliminated.

If the multiplexing/demultiplexing function is integrated with the OADM-type PXC, as is done with most implementations, the port-count requirement can be very small, typically just a few ports corresponding to the number of incoming fibers and add channels (or equivalently, the number of outgoing fibers and drop channels). Since the number of parallel switch planes grows with the number of wavelengths, as the network is built-out, there eventually will be a requirement for a medium-port-count PXC to optically multiplex the add and drop channels to reduce the number of transponders required by the EXC. In any case, the need for thousand-by-thousand PXCs has completely disappeared for this application.

On the other hand, carriers that cannot afford to build a brand new network and still have lots of voice traffic to carry (which is generating a substantial portion of their revenue) tend to endorse a more evolutionary architecture. Unlike two years ago, the purpose of the PXC is no longer to replace the EXC but to coexist with the EXC and complement and enhance its capabilities. In this case, the EXC, with its STS-1 grooming capability, is deployed as the central switching element and essentially the "gateway" between the metro and the LH networks.

The opportunity for PXCs is to address the carriers' need for a multiservice, multiband "hybrid" switch for the metro switching application. A hybrid switch, as described by the carriers, has two switch fabrics (Figure 2). Working with the EXC, the PXC is essentially a "smart" patch panel between the DWDM transport equipment and various peripheral multiservice tributary network elements (to provide express routing or bypass for wavelength-level traffic).

A second opportunity for deploying a hybrid switch (potentially more exciting and more lucrative) is at the access and enterprise end of the network, near the customer premises (Figure 3). In this case, there are usually a large number of TDM SONET rings collecting traffic from tributary network elements such as multiservice provisional platforms (MSPPs), traditional ATM switches, and IP routers. In addition to enabling express routing of wavelength traffic between elements, PXCs can also provide more cost-effective, autonomous, all-optical protection switching.

PXCs are under the same control plane software as the other network elements, so the carriers can remotely provision wavelength services in the metro network using the PXC with the same ease as the EXC. With PXCs, carriers now have additional flexibility for optimizing the network and the ability to eliminate expensive and unnecessary optical-electrical-optical (OEO) conversions whenever and wherever possible, saving significant cost when bypassing expensive and protocol-dependent OEO transponders.

In addition to cost differential, PXCs have the advantage of being transparent to both bit rate and protocol. It is future-proof and can accommodate an ever-changing variety of SONET and non-SONET traffic, which is a unique characteristic of the metro/access environment. With the volume of data traffic still doubling every year, the more cost-effective PXC is clearly an important tool to help the carriers stay competitive.

New role

Aside from the economics, there have been significant technological changes in the last two years in the optical network. In addition to ULR transport and tunable lasers, we have also witnessed a whole host of new network solutions that were not available and perhaps not even imaginable two years ago. For example, Cisco Systems has successfully created an entirely new category of access products with its ONS 15454 MSPPs (acquired from Cerent prior to OFC 2000), which can aggregate lower-speed tributary traffic from the customer premises to wavelength level. Similarly, Ciena has launched its next-generation EXC, the CoreDirector (acquired from Lightera, also prior to OFC 2000), which provides backward compatibility to SONET by electrically aggregating and grooming traffic at STS-1 granularity.

Together, these innovative and cost-effective products have provided much-needed relief for the traffic congestion problems originally meant for PXCs. At the same time, however, these data-friendly networking products have created new market opportunities for PXCs, making it possible to deploy them immediately without first requiring a Herculean effort to overhaul the legacy network architecture, thereby making the success of PXCs more tangible.

While the aforementioned technological changes in the last two years have reduced the port-count requirement for PXCs from thousands to hundreds, as the deployment of PXCs migrates from the core to the service layer to provide wavelength-level services, the potential market in terms of unit requirements has increased from hundreds to tens of thousands.

Therefore, a different future for PXCs has emerged that is perhaps more realistic and commercially more viable than the outlook articulated by the industry two years ago. And we also learned to never forget the railroad and the trains.

Dr. Denny K. Miu is founder and chief technology officer of Integrated Micromachines Inc. (Monrovia, CA).

Figure 2. The hybrid switch combines the best of photonic and optical-electrical-optical technologies.

Figure 3. Hybrid switches can accommodate traffic from a variety of equipment at the network edge.

Th 116073
More in Network Design