Study analyzes Carrier Ethernet over MSPP-based networks

April 1, 2007
2 min read

Multiservice provisioning platform (MSPP)-based SONET/SDH networks that are used to provide commercial Carrier Ethernet and residential triple-play services provide faster payback in Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities than Carrier Ethernet directly over fiber, contends a new study from Network Strategy Partners (NSP).

Using existing SONET/SDH networks for Carrier Ethernet in smaller cities costs less over 5 years than deploying an overlay Carrier Ethernet directly over fiber or DWDM transport, say NSP analysts.

“Smaller cities already have existing SONET/SDH networks deployed for TDM/PDH traffic,” explains Peter Fetterolf, NSP partner and author of the study. “Carrier Ethernet and triple-play services can be implemented quickly and cost-effectively using Ethernet cards on MSPP SONET/SDH nodes. The rollout of a separate Carrier Ethernet network cannot be justified in the short term because smaller cities do not have sufficient fiber connectivity, density, or demand,” he reports.

The study models a rich set of commercial and residential service offerings and calculates revenue, capex, and opex for three cities-Boston, MA; Stockton, CA; and Springdale, AR-representing Tier 1 through 3 cities, respectively. Financial metrics include cash flow, NPV, ROI, and payback.

The study also finds that:

  • Payback for MSPP networks was 2.5 to 3.6 years for Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities, respectively, versus 4.7 to 5.0 years for Carrier Ethernet directly over fiber or DWDM.
  • Payback for Tier 1 cities was 1.9 years for MSPP networks versus 1.8 years for Carrier Ethernet directly on fiber, justifying immediate build out of a separate network.
  • All cities offering video-on-demand should consider using a dedicated Carrier Ethernet ­network.
Visit www.nspllc.com for more information about Network Strategy Partners’ report, “The Business Case for Carrier Ethernet over MSPP SONET Networks.”
Sign up for Lightwave Newsletters
Get the latest news and updates.