FCC review order retains optical incentives

Aug. 22, 2003
22 August 2003 Washington, DC Lightwave -- The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally issued its long-delayed Triennial Review Order yesterday. While it retains the UNE-P unbundling restrictions the former regional Bell operating companies were hoping would disappear, the 576-page document does grant them a virtual monopoly on fiber-based broadband networks, as well as the broadband aspects of hybrid fiber/copper infrastructures.

22 August 2003 Washington, DC Lightwave -- The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) finally issued its long-delayed Triennial Review Order yesterday. While it retains the UNE-P unbundling restrictions the former regional Bell operating companies were hoping would disappear, the 576-page document does grant them a virtual monopoly on fiber-based broadband networks, as well as the broadband aspects of hybrid fiber/copper infrastructures.

The ex-Bells also will not be forced to share lit OC-n fiber-based pathways in the local loop, in particular where dark fiber or other access alternatives are available. However, that dark fiber must be unbundled for use by competitive carriers.

In making its determination that the incumbents can retain exclusive use of optical infrastructure deployed for packet-based services and other broadband offerings (they must provide access to 64-kbit/sec pathway for competitive narrowband services when they replace copper loops with fiber), the FCC said it was working to stimulate construction of next-generation broadband infrastructure. On the one hand, the incumbents will be more willing to invest in fiber networks if they are assured that they won't have to share them, the commission believes. On the other, competitive carriers will be more likely to build their own optical infrastructures if their access to the incumbents' plant is limited.

The perception that both incumbents and competitors are basically starting from scratch when it comes to fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) underlies the FCC's position. Relying on information from Corning (whose executives wrote several letters to the FCC on the FTTH question), the FCC believes that only 47 communities in the United States "enjoy widespread FTTH deployment." Within these communities says Corning, competitive carriers have deployed fiber loops to 44,890 homes, compared to the incumbents' 4,000 (and only 400 of these are the work of the ex-Bells); municipalities account for loops to 18,100 homes. Thus, since the commissioners assume that installation costs and regulatory barriers are relatively equal for incumbents and competitors alike, neither camp is seen to have an advantage when it comes to FTTH. Therefore, the FCC appears to believe that there is no reason to make the incumbents share infrastructure when competitors have an equal opportunity to build it themselves or buy dark fiber wholesale.

The order states that the FCC recognized that this ruling could give the incumbents the ability to shut out competitors by replacing existing copper loops with fiber in the name of broadband networking. Therefore, when incumbents do overbuild copper infrastructure, they have the option of either granting competitors enough bandwidth over the new plant to provide narrowband services, or keeping the old copper infrastructure open for use.

Sharing of hybrid networks, including those using digital loop carriers (DLCs), follow a similar logic. Incumbents must enable competitors to offer narrowband services, but do not have to share the capabilities that support packet-based services. Specifically, the order says that incumbents do not need to unbundled any transmission path over optical plant between the central office and the customer's premises (including the fiber feeder plant) that is used to transmit packet-based services. Similarly, the incumbents also do not have to share any electronics or other equipment used to transmit such packet-based services, including xDSL-capable line cards installed in DLCs or equipment used to provide passive optical network (PON) capabilities to the mass market.

The complete order, as well as comments from each of the commissioners, is available on the FCC's Web site. Michael Copps was the only commissioner to attack the optical broadband policy as anti-competitive. However, significant dissension arose concerning the UNE-P requirements as well as the role of state public utility commissions in enforcing the order.

-- Stephen Hardy

Sponsored Recommendations

Coherent Routing and Optical Transport – Getting Under the Covers

April 11, 2024
Join us as we delve into the symbiotic relationship between IPoDWDM and cutting-edge optical transport innovations, revolutionizing the landscape of data transmission.

Scaling Moore’s Law and The Role of Integrated Photonics

April 8, 2024
Intel presents its perspective on how photonic integration can enable similar performance scaling as Moore’s Law for package I/O with higher data throughput and lower energy consumption...

From 100G to 1.6T: Navigating Timing in the New Era of High-Speed Optical Networks

Feb. 19, 2024
Discover the dynamic landscape of hyperscale data centers as they embrace accelerated AI/ML growth, propelling a transition from 100G to 400G and even 800G optical connectivity...

Supporting 5G with Fiber

April 12, 2023
Network operators continue their 5G coverage expansion – which means they also continue to roll out fiber to support such initiatives. The articles in this Lightwave On ...