Passive impact

Sept. 1, 2001

To be passive is not necessarily to be ineffective. Consider the historical value of passive resistance in the struggle for political freedom, and the safety value of passive restraint systems. Passive optical components have been critical elements in fiberoptic system design from the outset. One could argue that optical fiber itself is one long, thin passive component, although we tend instead to talk about passive components as being circulators, micro-optics, thin-film filters, gratings, and the like.

In fact, it's becoming more difficult to separate passive components and their "apparent" opposites, active components. As more and more formerly separate components become integrated—whether on a substrate or within a module—the boundaries become blurred. For example, is a variable optical attenuator (VOA) passive or active? Some sort of force is applied to it to change its properties and effect on light, which would argue for the "active" designation. Yet it's usually classified as passive. And forget that argument—what about the case in which VOAs are added to an arrayed waveguide? Surely the integrated package could be termed active?

In this issue we stick to the classic type of passive component, but I think the subject matter shows that they too have an "impact." Guy Sauvé from ITF Optical argues that designers cannot just assume that passive components that perform well at 2.5 and 10 Gbit/s will do so at 40 Gbit/s; new thinking is needed. The components he describes are also the subjects of articles by Wallace Latimer at Edmund Scientific and Ivan Maksymyk at StockerYale, who write on the production of coatings and fiber Bragg gratings, respectively. Consultant Joe Shiefman adds another twist when he describes the tolerance challenges inherent in optical manufacturing and how software can help determine proper alignment and performance. All of these articles reflect the dynamic happenings under way in the passive-component world.

MORE OF THE SAMEThere is much more in this issue than passive components. For example, Eric Chen and Donald Lu at J. P. Morgan Securities present Part 1 of their conclusions about the state of the component manufacturing industry, and its sustainability. And Rajive Dhar and Mark Lowry at Atoga Systems show how metro networks can make use of tunable lasers.

My point is that, in this our first independent issue, we remain committed to providing a variety of sophisticated and technically useful articles that will help you meet the challenges of engineering the optical network. This last phrase, conveniently, is our cover tag line accompanying the new, more readable page layout inside. With 35,000 readers, we have a lot of challenges to meet—which appeals to my passive-aggressive nature.

W. Conard Holton
Associate Publisher/Editor in Chief
[email protected]

Sponsored Recommendations

March 12, 2025
Join us for an engaging discussion with industry experts on the intersection of AI and optics. Moderated by Sean Buckley, editor-in-chief of Lightwave+BTR, this panel will explore...
March 25, 2025
Explore how government initiatives and industry innovations are transforming rural broadband deployments, overcoming cost and logistical challenges to connect underserved areas...
March 7, 2025
In today’s hyperconnected world, rolling out and managing profitable, high-performance networks for access and transport will require innovative architectural approaches. The ...
April 10, 2025
The value of pluggable optics in open-line systems is also becoming more apparent. This webinar describes this trend and explores how such modules can best be employed. Register...