IPtronics, Avago escalate patent war

Nov. 1, 2012
Parallel optics semiconductor vendor IPtronics A/S has launched a new volley in its patent battle with Avago Technologies (NASDAQ:AVGO). The company alleged in claims filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose last week that Avago violated its legal obligations to fellow members of the Small Form Factor (SFF) standards group and failed to protect IPtronics’ confidential information.

Parallel optics semiconductor vendor IPtronics A/S has launched a new volley in its patent battle with Avago Technologies (NASDAQ:AVGO). The company alleged in claims filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Jose last week that Avago violated its legal obligations to fellow members of the Small Form Factor (SFF) standards group and failed to protect IPtronics’ confidential information. A source within Avago’s patent team dismissed the claims and promised the company would file a response in rebuttal.

The clash between the two companies began in June 2010 when, fresh off of winning a decision before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) against EMCORE regarding its parallel optics patents, Avago launched a similar case in U.S. Court against the privately held IPtronics. Avago alleged that IPtronics’ VCSEL drivers violated two Avago patents, U.S. 6,947,456 (“Open-loop laser driver having an integrated digital controller,” otherwise known as “the 456 patent”) and U.S. 5,359,447 (“Optical communication with vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser operating in multiple transverse modes,” or “the 447 patent”).

The 447 patent is the primary target of IPtronics’ latest claims. As described to Lightwave by IPtronics Chairman Martin Rofheart, the patent covers an optical communication system with a power source, a surface-emitting laser (specifically, a VCSEL), what is in essence a multimode fiber and coupling assembly, and a receiver. An important point to note, asserted Rofheart, is that the surface-emitting laser in the patent is described as having an aperture of 8 microns or greater.

IPtronics alleges in its filing that Avago failed to inform its fellow members on the SFF-8436 committee that it owned “essential IP” germane to the specifications, then failed to provide free or reasonable and non-discriminatory access to the IP as it was bound to do by SFF patent policy.

In addition, as Floyd Anderson, vice president and chief patent counsel at Avago told Lightwave, Avago has asserted under a “doctrine of equivalence” in its case against IPtronics that the 447 patent also covers surface emitting lasers with apertures smaller than 8 microns. Thus, Rofheart implied to Lightwave, if Avago is successful in its suit, it will be able to assert that any VCSEL-based module designed to SFF-8436 – and, potentially, other short-reach VCSEL-based specifications – is in violation of the 447 patent.

The implications of such a decision are significant, Rofheart said, given that the QSFP optical transceivers commonly used in 40 Gigabit Ethernet multimode fiber applications are based on VCSELs and SFF-8436. Similar legal doubt could be cast on VCSEL-based modules designed to 100GBase-SR10 as well as modules that may be designed to the 4x25-Gbps multimode specifications now under development by the IEEE, he added.

Anderson pointed out that EMCORE made similar assertions in the earlier case before the ITC, which the ITC rejected. He says that Avago will file a response to IPtronics’ claims in the California court. Without saying what that response will entail to avoid disclosing Avago’s legal strategy, Anderson stated, “We are confident we will be able to respond to their allegations.”

In the meantime, Rofheart said that IPtronics is rallying support for its cause from its customers and fellow members of SFF. He said that some of these vendors have privately expressed support, but none has agreed to join the suit or file a similar claim.

Rofheart added that it could take 18 to 30 months for the court to reach a final decision, barring a settlement or some other major event.

For more information on optical components and suppliers, visit the Lightwave Buyer’s Guide.


About the Author

Stephen Hardy | Editorial Director and Associate Publisher

Stephen Hardy has covered fiber optics for more than 15 years, and communications and technology for more than 30 years. He is responsible for establishing and executing Lightwave's editorial strategy across its digital magazine, website, newsletters, research and other information products. He has won multiple awards for his writing.

Contact Stephen to discuss:

  • Contributing editorial material to the Web site or digital magazine
  • The direction of a digital magazine issue, staff-written article, or event
  • Lightwave editorial attendance at industry events
  • Arranging a visit to Lightwave's offices
  • Coverage of announcements
  • General questions of an editorial nature

Sponsored Recommendations

On Topic: Optical Players Race to Stay Pace With the AI Revolution

Sept. 18, 2024
The optical industry is moving fast with new approaches to satisfying the ever-growing demand from hyperscalers, which are balancing growing bandwidth demands with power efficiency...

The Pluggable Transceiver Revolution

May 30, 2024
Discover the revolution of pluggable transceivers in our upcoming webinar, where we delve into the advancements propelling 400G and 800G coherent optics. Learn how these innovations...

ON TOPIC: Cable’s Fiber to the X Play

Aug. 28, 2024
Cable operators are strategically deploying fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) networks in Greenfield markets and Brownfield markets where existing cable plant has reached its end of life...

Advancing Data Center Interconnection

July 25, 2024
Data Center Interconnect (DCI) solutions provide physical or virtual network connections between remote data center locations. Connecting geographically dispersed data centers...